No, No, No!!! Other way around... Natalie is not necessarily heads & shoulders above Winona but definitely more classy (A Harvard Graduate) more worldly renown.
Winona was the next Audrey Hepburn, Rachael Leigh Cook lost the chance and later Natalie Portman took the opportunity, in consequence Keira Knightley too,but she is woman action movies,all these similar
author: Type your name (not verified) Fri, 08/20/2010 - 10:32
Natalie is a Harvard graduate, i think she's worked up enough respect to be known as her own self instead of an "Audrey wannabe". She's an amazing actor and is very attractive
author: Lana (not verified) Tue, 03/23/2010 - 08:00
They have a slight resemblance, I think. I never really thought of them looking similar before.
I don't know what this business with "the next Audrey Hepburn" is about. None of the mentioned ladies (Portman, Wood, Knightley, Ryder) look like Audrey, nor do they remind me of her in any concrete way.
Winona & Natalie, no way they are similar. Winona has those big, bright doe eyes that stare into your soul while Natalie is very plain-looking (although talented), IMO. As for Audrey, I don't care for old movie stars or living up to their so-called standards, so don't even get me started on that (besides, before the paparazzi and all the instant, crazy media we have today, just about anyone had the ability to remain "classy" and glamorous at all times in the eyes of others).
Paparazzi definitely existed then (how do you think we got their pictures from? lol) they just weren't as relentless back than. I see what you mean though, I agree. It bugs me when young people refer to old hollywood as 'better' or 'classier' than today.
amazing resemblance. love the look, can be so classy! audrey hepburn for the 21stC
simply like three of them, ...yeaaaa.. they share some common features, facial and great performance.. my type of girl
Winona is way prettier than Natalie.
No, No, No!!! Other way around... Natalie is not necessarily heads & shoulders above Winona but definitely more classy (A Harvard Graduate) more worldly renown.
Winona was the next Audrey Hepburn, Rachael Leigh Cook lost the chance and later Natalie Portman took the opportunity, in consequence Keira Knightley too,but she is woman action movies,all these similar
Yep these are all Audrey wannabes. But none of them was as classy as Audrey--I mean, Winona and Natalie? Don't make me laugh.
Natalie is a Harvard graduate, i think she's worked up enough respect to be known as her own self instead of an "Audrey wannabe". She's an amazing actor and is very attractive
They have a slight resemblance, I think. I never really thought of them looking similar before.
I don't know what this business with "the next Audrey Hepburn" is about. None of the mentioned ladies (Portman, Wood, Knightley, Ryder) look like Audrey, nor do they remind me of her in any concrete way.
Winona & Natalie, no way they are similar. Winona has those big, bright doe eyes that stare into your soul while Natalie is very plain-looking (although talented), IMO. As for Audrey, I don't care for old movie stars or living up to their so-called standards, so don't even get me started on that (besides, before the paparazzi and all the instant, crazy media we have today, just about anyone had the ability to remain "classy" and glamorous at all times in the eyes of others).
Paparazzi definitely existed then (how do you think we got their pictures from? lol) they just weren't as relentless back than. I see what you mean though, I agree. It bugs me when young people refer to old hollywood as 'better' or 'classier' than today.
Post new comment